Dorchester-based Alcohol Education Trust (AET) has welcomed the recommendations from the Home Affairs Committee on drink spiking.

Helena Conibear, CEO of the AET, submitted 16 pages of evidence to the committee, as well as appearing to give evidence in person, and is thrilled that nearly all of the proposals that the AET put forward have been recommended.

She said: "The lack of reporting by those who have been victims of drink spiking, the lack of collecting forensic evidence from those who are brave enough to share their ordeal and the lack of prosecutions have allowed the perpetrators of spiking to get away with this crime for far too long.

"At last we have some concrete proposals that will address the crime - the reclassification of the most common drugs used for spiking and the move towards drink spiking being a stand-alone offence and a focus on collecting evidence will make a huge difference to addressing this scourge on society."

The Home Affairs Committee has warned that spiking will remain an invisible crime unless more is done to improve awareness and support victims. In a report, the committee finds that a lack of available data on spiking has made it difficult to get a clear picture of its true extent, and will remain a barrier to policing until data collection is improved. A culture of viewing victims as having had 'one too many' and a lack of co-ordinated support from venues, police and health services has meant many incidents are going unreported. The committee calls for a focussed response to ensure that incidents are better investigated and a knowledge base developed to underpin new strategies to combat spiking. 

At present, not enough is being done to support victims. The Committee's own survey conducted as part of this inquiry revealed that nine out of 10 respondents said they did not receive support after a spiking incident. Fewer than a third reported the incident, and for those that did, no further action was taken in most cases. 

The committee finds that more needs to be done to ensure that victims know their complaint will be taken seriously. The creation of a new spiking criminal offence, currently under consideration by the Government, would help improve the response to incidents and effectiveness of prevention strategies. Police forces should also be required to carry out forensic testing quickly and to a quality that can be used in court cases. Communications need to improve so that victims know where they can receive help and to increase overall awareness.  

Venues where spiking incidents are more likely to occur, such as pubs, clubs and festivals, must be safe spaces for their patrons. Local authorities and licensing authorities need to use their licensing powers to ensure that venues have adequate security and staff trained to identify spiking incidents. 

Dame Diana Johnson, chairman of the Home Affairs Committee, said: "Spiking is an insidious act. Victims will often have little idea of what has happened, who spiked them, when it occurred or what has been put in their system. They are left with feelings of self-doubt and vulnerability. Yet, while the threat is well known, little has been done to prevent it from happening. 

"There needs to be a concerted effort to stamp out spiking. Much more work needs to be done to improve understanding and awareness so that people are reassured that the help will be there should they need it. They need to know that they will be taken seriously and action taken. 

"It isn't good enough to tell people to put lids on their drinks or normalise taking a testing kit out with you. Everyone should have the right to go out and enjoy themselves without fear. The message needs to be sent to perpetrators that spiking is absolutely unacceptable and will be punished."

You can read the whole report and recommendations here.